(Click on Tutorial title to access the abstract and the author's vita.)

IJCNN I

"Neural Networks That Actually Work In Prediction and Decision/Control: Common Misconceptions Versus Real-World Success"
Paul J. Werbos

"Kalman Filter Training of Neural Networks: Methodology and Applications"
Danil Prokhorov

"Neural Control Systems"
Bernard Widrow

"Feature extraction in Computational Intelligence"
Evangelia Micheli-Tzanakou, PhD

 

IJCNN II

"Autonomous Mental Development: A New Frontier for Computational Intelligence"
Juyang Weng

"Cellular Visual Microprocessors: Theory, Implementation and Applications"
Csaba Rekeczky and Ákos Zarándy

 

FUZZ III

"Data Mining, Modeling and Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics"
Nik Kasabov

"Introduction to Clustering Techniques"
Katsuhiro Honda, Francesco Masulli & Stefano Rovetta

"Fuzzy Sets for Words: Why Type-2 Fuzzy Sets Should be Used and How They Can be Used"
Jerry Mendel

 

(Back to top of IJCNN I)

IJCNN I

"Neural Networks That Actually Work In Prediction and Decision/Control: Common Misconceptions Versus Real-World Success"
Paul J. Werbos
NSF

Abstract: Neural nets are used in a growing variety of real-world applications, in a growing number of areas (including the modeling of natural intelligence). But this has been a mixed blessing, as various subcultures have not kept up with each other. For example, at http://www.eas.asu.edu/~nsfadp/ applications of adaptive dynamic programming (aka advanced reinforcement learning) are reported which beat the previous best performance in electric power grid control, aircraft control, in large-scale logistics, etc. -- but best performance requires integrating concepts from many subcultures. Yet in some subcultures, people are still using "mappings from sensory to motor coordinates" (direct adaptive control), whose limits were clear years ago. Some are using indirect methods inspired by control theory with well-known stability theorems -- theorems whose conditions are rarely satisfied, and methods which are easily improved upon. Similarly, in prediction, some subcultures falsely believe that recurrent networks are hard to train and of marginal benefit, even as people in industry use them routinely, and report performance better than extended Kalman filters and equal (at lower cost) to elaborate particle filter methods. The foundations of learning also bear on the practical choices. This tutorial will try to offer a kind of practical roadmap of these issues, and suggest how it points towards future functionality in tasks as large-scale as what brains can handle.

Vita: Paul J. Werbos is best known as the original inventor of backpropagation, as part of his Harvard PhD thesis, which was reprinted in full in his book the Roots of Backpropagation, Wiley 1994, along with his classic 1990 tutorial on backpropagation through time for Proc IEEE. Also, his 1967 article in Cybernetica first proposed the idea of approximating dynamic programming as a way to improve reinforcement learning, elaborated in many later papers. He was one of the three original two-year presidents of the International Neural Network Society, and winner of the IEEE Pioneer Award. He is Program Director for Control, Networks and Computational Intelligence at NSF, which actively seeks more proposals in this area. He has also been active in many cross-cutting funding initiatives; for example, he serves on the Working Group for energy storage and distribution of the interagency Climate Change Technology Program, and coordinated the NASA-NSF-EPRI solicitation on space solar power (NSF 02-098). He is also on the Planning Committee of the Millennium Project of the United Nations University (http://millennium- project.org), and has published a few papers on quantum foundations and technology (see arXiv.org, physics and nonlinear systems). He also has two degrees in economics from Harvard and the London School of Economics. He is on the governing boards of INNS and of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

(Back to top of IJCNN I)

"Kalman Filter Training of Neural Networks: Methodology and Applications"
Danil V. Prokhorov
Ford Research and Advanced Engineering

Abstract: We would like to share with you our experience with neural network training acquired over many years of application-driven studies at Ford Motor Company.  Our main focus is on training recurrent neural networks (RNN) using a set of powerful techniques based on the Kalman filter method.  RNN considered here are very flexible discrete-time computational structures often called time-lagged RNN.  (For example, recurrent multilayer perceptrons (RMLP) are a special case of such RNN.)  The trick is how to train them.  This tutorial is for anybody who wants to learn arguably the most effective training methodology for RNN.

Our studies are carried out both with models and using real data gathered from physical systems. We intend to cover backpropagation through time (BPTT), extended Kalman filter (EKF), multi-stream EKF and other EKF extensions, nonlinear Kalman filter and joint estimation of states and weights, followed by examples. 

Vita: Danil Prokhorov began his technical career in St. Petersburg, Russia.  He received his Diploma in Robotics in 1992.  In late 1993 he moved to the U.S. to study for a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering with emphasis on artificial neural networks.  He is one of the early students and active proponents of the Kalman Filter NN Training.  Upon graduation in late 1997, he joined Ford Research Laboratory in Detroit Metropolitan area to carry out machine learning research and development.

(Back to top of IJCNN I)

"Neural Control Systems"
Bernard Widrow
Stanford University

Abstract: This tutorial will describe a variety of adaptive control algorithms for linear and nonlinear systems. These topics include adaptive inverse control, self-learning neural control systems, and neurointerfaces that allow human operators, providing high-level command inputs, to control complex nonlinear systems.

At present, the control of a dynamic system (the "plant") is generally done by means of feedback. Adaptive inverse control is an alternative approach that uses adaptive filtering to achieve feedforward control. Precision is attained because of the feedback incorporated in the adaptive learning. Adaptive inverse control places an adaptive filter whose transfer function converges to the inverse or reciprocal of that of the plant in cascade with it. If the plant is minimum-phase, an inverse is easily obtained. If the plant is nonminimum-phase, a delayed inverse can be obtained. Plant disturbance can be optimally controlled by a special circuit that obtains the disturbance at the plant output, filters it, and feeds it back into the plant input. The circuit works in such a way that the feedback does not alter the plant dynamic response. So, optimal disturbance control and control of dynamic response can be accomplished independently.

Self-learning neural controls apply to nonlinear plants that can be started with arbitrary initial conditions, and their neural controllers learn to bring the plants to desired final conditions.
Learning is accomplished by "backpropagation through time." Applications are shown to the "truck-backer," backing a truck with one or two trailers to a loading platform, to the control of a construction crane, and to robotics.

Neurointerfaces are trainable filters that serve as couplers between human operators and nonlinear systems or plants to be controlled or directed. The purpose of the coupler is to ease the task of the human controller. The equations of a given plant are assumed to be known or at least approximately known. If the plant is unstable, it must first be stabilized by feedback. Using the plant equations, off-line automatic learning algorithms are developed for training the weights of the neurointerface. If the plant is subject to disturbance, an adaptive disturbance canceller is used to minimize the effect. The neurointerface can be adapted to be an approximate inverse of the plant, so that when it is cascaded with the plant, the overall plant response closely approximates the human command input, making it easy for the human operator to control difficult-to-control plants.


Vita:
Bernard Widrow received the S.B., S.M., and Sc.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1951, 1953, and 1956, respectively. He joined the MIT faculty and taught there from 1956 to 1959. In 1959, he joined the faculty of Stanford University, where he is currently Professor of Electrical Engineering.

He began research on adaptive filters, learning processes, and artificial neural models in 1957. Together with M.E. Hoff, Jr., his first doctoral student at Stanford, he invented with LMS algorithm on in the Autumn of 1959. Today, this is the world's most widely used learning algorithm. He has continued working on adaptive signal processing, adaptive controls, and neural networks since that time.

Dr. Widrow is a Life Fellow of the IEEE and a Fellow of AAAS. He received the IEEE Centennial Medal in 1984, the IEEE Alexander Graham Bell Medal in 1986, the IEEE Signal Processing Society Medal in 1986, the IEEE Neural Networks Pioneer Medal in 1991, the IEEE Millennium Medal in 2000, and the Benjamin Franklin Medal for Engineering from the Franklin Institute of Philadelphia in 2001. He was inducted into the National Academy of Engineering in 1995 and into the Silicon Valley Engineering Council Hall of Fame in 1999.

Dr. Widrow is a past president and currently a member of the Governing Board of the International Neural Network Society. He is a member of the AdCom of the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society. He is associate editor of several journals and is the author of over 100 technical papers and 18 patents. He is co-author of "Adaptive Signal Processing" and "Adaptive Inverse Control," both Prentice-Hall books. A new book, "Quantization Noise," is in preparation.

(Back to top of IJCNN I)

"Feature extraction in Computational Intelligence"
Evangelia Micheli-Tzanakou, PhD

Biomedical Engineering
Rutgers Univ.

Abstract: One of the major problems a researcher faces is what is learned from data obtained by various methods and different techniques. This tutorial will discuss and compare topics such as:

Statistical Advances and Challenges, as well as Feature Extraction in Computational Intelligence methodologies.

Often a simple model describes the data well, simply because the S/N ratio is too small for detection of more complex structures-which for example is the case with medical data involving human subjects. One has a lot of variability both in intra- and inter-sets of data.

Some important Simple Tools that have been used for a long time are: Linear Regression, Discriminant analysis, Principal Component Analysis etc.

In all of these, the size of the data set matters. Huge data sets create memory problems. The question is how do we handle different data types and how do we handle them? What if the data are correlated? What if we have complex data structures?

In this tutorial you will learn more about Computational Intelligence, how to get to know your data and how to do Feature Extraction.

Some examples of "features" will be given and different feature extraction methods will be discussed.

Vita:
Evangelia Micheli-Tzanakou Dr. Tzanakou is Professor II and director of the Computational Intelligence Laboratories (2000-present); Chair of Biomedical Engineering Dept at Rutgers University (1990-2000);established the BME Undergraduate curriculum in 1999. Has an active research group and has published over 250 scientific papers. Author/co-author of 2 books. Has graduated 37 MS and PhDs.

Fellowships: IEEE Fellow (1992);Founding Fellow, American Institute for Medical & Biological Eng. (AIMBE), 1993; Member of Sigma Xi and Eta Kappa Nu; Listed in American Men and Women in Science; Honorary Member of the British Brain Research Association; Honorary Member of the European Brain and Behavior Society.

Awards: NJ Women of Achievement Award, 1995; Featured in the “Notable Twentieth Century Scientists, 1994; Achievement Award Recipient, Society of Women Engineers, 1992; Outstanding IEEE Branch Advisor/Counselor Award, 1985 ; cited as a Pioneer in the IEEE Web page (http://www.ieee.org/innovators).

Editorships: Editorial Board, IEEE Trans. On Nano-BioScience (2002-present); Editorial Board Biomedical Engineering On Line (2001-present ); Associate Editor, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks (2000-present); Book Series Editor in Biomedical Engineering, Plenum/Klewer (1999-present); Book Series Editor, Biomedical Systems, IES Book series, CRC Press (1997-present); Editorial Board, IEEE Trans. Biomedical Information Tech.(1997-2001); Editorial Board, International J. On Advanced Computational Intelligence (1997-1999); Associate Editor, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks (1989-1992).

(Back to top of IJCNN I)

 

 
 

(Back to top of IJCNN II)

IJCNN II

"Autonomous Mental Development: A New Frontier for Computational Intelligence"
Juyang Weng
Professor, Embodied Intelligence Laboratory
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Michigan State University

Abstract: What is autonomous mental development (AMD)?   Why is it a new frontier for computational intelligence?  Why do neural networks, genetic computation and fuzzy computation all converge on the new ground of mental development?  What do recent results in neural science imply for computational intelligence?  Is human brain a signal processor or a symbolic processor?   Why can human programmers write excellent computer chess playing programs but vision, speech and language are still grand challenges for computers?   Can a machine develop these capabilities autonomously?   How can we enable a machine to learn autonomously online in real time directly from the physical world of complex human environment?

We will address these fundamental questions in this tutorial.  We will systematically study a concept called task muddiness which explains why traditional approaches to machine intelligence “have run out of steam” and why AMD is necessary for machines to deal with muddy tasks.   Computational modeling of autonomous mental development is a new field that has drawn increasing attention from fields such as robotics, multimedia signal processing, vision, speech, machine intelligence, neuroscience and psychology.  In this tutorial, we will present computational models that enable robots to develop its mental skills autonomously through online, real-time interactions with its environment.  Such robots are called developmental robots and the program that enables AMD by robots is called developmental program.   AMD requires that the internal representation and some architecture of the robot be generated automatically and incrementally through the developmental process.    The goal of this new research field is to enable humans to “raise” developmental robots “mentally” through online, interactive “robot sitting” and “robot classes.”   Computational models of AMD and verification of the models on robots can potentially cast new light on the way human brain works.   This tutorial will describe several robots at MSU and elsewhere as early prototypes of such a new kind of robot along with some video demonstrations.   The potential social and economical impact of developmental robots will also be discussed.

Tutorial topics:

  1. Muddiness of tasks

  2. Overview of approaches --- knowledge-based, learning-based, behavior-based, evolutional and the new developmental approach

  3. Human mental development, results from neuroscience and developmental psychology

  4. Review of animal learning theories

  5. Supervised, reinforcement and communicative learning

  6. Architectures for automatic mental development

  7. Sensory mapping: representation, development and computation

  8. Cognitive mapping: representation, development and computation

  9. Motor mapping: representation, development and computation

  10. Value system

  11. Integration of mental capabilities: audition, touch, language, reasoning, decision making, planning, object manipulation and navigation

  12. Thinking by a developmental robot

  13. Examples of developmental robot

  14. Theoretical completeness and performance metrics

  15. Applications and the future of developmental robots

 Length: 2 hours

Prerequisites:  General programming experience, basic knowledge about vector and matrix operations.   Students in neuroscience and psychology can also understand most of the material.

Primary audience:  researchers in signal processing, image processing, computer vision, pattern recognition, speech recognition, language processing, robotics, human-machine interface, artificial intelligence and new-generation computer architecture.

Secondary audience:  researchers in neuroscience, psychology, philosophy, and government policy makers for science and technology.

Handout: Tutorial material will be provided by the host institution.

Vita: Juyang Weng is a professor at the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.   His research interests include computer vision, speech recognition, human-machine multimodal interface using vision, audition, speech, gesture and actions, and intelligent robots.  He is the author or coauthor of over one hundred research articles and book chapters.  He is a coauthor  (with T. S. Huang and N. Ahuja) of the book Motion and Structure from Image Sequences (Springer-Verlag, 1993).   He is an editor-in-chief of International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, an associate editor of IEEE Trans. on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence.  He was an associate editor of IEEE Trans. on Image Processing (1994-1997), a program co-chair of the NSF/DARPA Workshop on Development and Learning (WDL), held April, 5-7, 2000 at Michigan State University (MSU), East Lansing, MI (http://www.cse.msu.edu/dl/), and a program co-chair of the International Conference on Development and Learning 2002 (ICDL’02), held at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, June 12- 15, 2002 (http://www.egr.msu.edu/icdl02/).  An article “Autonomous Mental Development by Robots and Animals,” that he co-authored appeared in Science, the issue of Jan. 26, 2001.  He initiated and supervised the SAIL (Self-organizing Autonomous Incremental Learner) and Dav projects, in which he and his coworkers have designed and custom built their SAIL and Dav robots for research on autonomous mental development.   More detail is available on line at http://www.cse.msu.edu/~weng/.

(Back to top of IJCNN II)

"Cellular Visual Microprocessors:
Theory, Implementation and Applications"

Csaba Rekeczky and Ákos Zarándy
Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Abstract: The aim of the session is to present the latest results on theory, design and applications of cellular visual microprocessors and topographic array computing on data flows. Cellular Neural Network (CNN) based architectures will be put into focus with embedded optical sensors, i.e. neural network based visual array
microprocessors. Overviews will be given on theory and design; neurobiological motivations and models; different analog and mixed-signal chip implementations and some key application areas will be highlighted. By emphasizing concrete chip implementations in the CNN field, we hope this tutorial will provide
attendees unfamiliar with recent advances an easily accessible way to appreciate the potential impact of the work in this area, as well as experienced researchers with an update of the latest results. This session could also be viewed as a forum to encourage discussion about other neural network hardware realizations having a particular set of applications in mind.

Vitas:
Csaba Rekeczky was born in 1968. He received the M.S. degree in electrical engineering from the Technical University of Budapest in 1993. After graduation he joined the Neuromorphic Information Technology interdisciplinary postgraduate program and continued his studies at the Analogic and Neural Computing Systems Laboratory of the Computer and Automation Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. During this period he completed research investigations in the frontier of nonlinear network theory and signal processing, computational neurobiology and non-invasive medical diagnosis. In 1994 and 1995 he spent a year at the Tokushima University (Tokushima, Japan) as a visiting scholar working on cellular neural network projects related to medical image processing. In 1997 and 1998 he conducted research in nonlinear image processing and neuromorphic modeling of the vertebrate retina at the University of California (Berkeley, USA). He received the PhD degree in electrical engineering from the Budapest University of Technology and Economics in 1999. Recently, along with his co-authors, he has won the Best Paper Award for 1998 from the Wiley Publisher (CTA). Currently his research interest is focused on computational aspects of cellular nonlinear arrays and includes neuromorphic modeling of biological sensing, nonlinear adaptive techniques in signal processing and special topics in machine vision. He is the member of the IEEE and a technical committee member of NSA-TC (IEEE NN Society), CNNAC-TC and SMM-TC (IEEE CAS Society).

Ákos Zarándy was born in 1967. He received the M.S. degree in electrical engineering from the Technical University of Budapest in 1992. He joined to Analogic and Neural Computing Systems Laboratory of the Computer and Automation Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in 1990. He completed his PhD studies between 1992-1997. During this time he was dealing with Cellular Neural/nonlinear Networks (CNN) programming, CNN chip development system building, biological modeling, color processing, modeling of visual illusions, and mathematical morphology. He spent more than two years at the University of California (Berkeley, USA) as visiting scholar and as visiting post doc. Currently, his research interest is focused on the building of ultra-high speed visual decision making systems, and biologically motivated locally adaptive sensor matrixes. He is member of the IEEE and technical committee member of CNNAC-TC (IEEE CAS Society).

(Back to top of IJCNN II)

 
 

(Back to top of FUZZ III)

FUZZ III

"Data Mining, Modeling and Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics"
Nik Kasabov
Director, Knowledge Engineering and Discovery Research Institute KEDRI
Auckland

Keywords: soft computing, neuro-fuzzy systems, bioinformatics, gene expression data, DNA, proteins, gene networks

Abstract: Bioinformatics is a new area of science that is concerned with the information processing of biological information. The first part of the tutorial presents a short introduction to molecular biology and Bioinformatics [1] as well as a brief review of the principles and the techniques of soft computing [2]. Methods of learning from data, that includes: inductive and transductive systems, adaptive learning, data and knowledge integration are reviewed. A comprehensive software environment NeuCom (http://www.theneucom.com) for data mining, modeling and discovery will be demonstrated and will be made available to participants. In the second part of the tutorial, problems in bioinformatics and medical decision support are defined and solved with the use of various soft-computing methods and their combination. The problems include: promoter recognition; gene expression data analysis for cancer and other disease profiling; modeling gene regulatory
networks; integrating gene and clinical data; protein structure prediction; cardio-vascular risk prognosis; renal function evaluation; survival prognosis. There are five main phases of information processing and problem solving in most bioinformatics systems that are covered for each of the above problems, namely: data pre-processing and filtering; feature evaluation and feature selection; model creation and evaluation; knowledge extraction; adaptation to new data.
References:
[1] N.Kasabov, Evolving Connectionist Systems: Methods and Applications in Bioinformatics, Brain Study and Intelligent Machines, Springer Verlag, 2002 (www.springer.de)
[2] N.Kasabov, Foundations of neural networks, fuzzy systems and knowledge engineering, MIT Press, 1996

Vita: Professor Nik Kasabov, FRSNZ, FNZCS, SMIEE, is the Founding Director and the Chief Scientist of the Knowledge Engineering and Discovery Research Institute KEDRI, Auckland (www.kedri.info/). He holds a Chair of Knowledge Engineering at the School of Computer and Information Sciences at Auckland University of Technology. He holds MSc and PhD from the Technical University of Sofia. His main research interests are in the areas of: intelligent information systems, soft computing, neuro-computing, bioinformatics, brain study, speech and image processing, novel methods for data mining and knowledge discovery. He has extensive academic experience, holding positions of Associate Professor (Technical University of Sofia, Bulgaria), Senior Lecturer (University of Essex, UK), and Professor and Associate Professor (University of Otago, New Zealand). He is a board member of the Asia Pacific Neural Network Assembly (APNNA) and was its President in 1997/98. Kasabov is on the editorial boards of 7 international journals and has been on the PC of 50 international conferences in the last 5 years. He chaired the series of ANNES conferences (1993-2001). More information of Prof. Kasabov can be found at the Web site: http://www.kedri.info.

(Back to top of FUZZ III)

"INTRODUCTION TO CLUSTERING TECHNIQUES"
Katsuhiro Honda,
Osaka Prefecture University, Japan
Prof. Francesco Masulli,
University of Pisa, Italy
and
Prof. Stefano Rovetta
University of Genova, Italy

Clustering is pervasively used in several fields such as data mining, pattern recognition, and machine learning. Clustering helps in providing structure to large datasets, enabling for instance indexing, searching and categorization of document databases, or exploratory models for molecular data such as gene expression levels in disease characterization.
In this tutorial we will outline some recently proposed techniques, which address issues of widely used clustering algorithms.


GENERALIZATION OF POSSIBILISTIC CLUSTERING

We consider a class of clustering algorithms from a unified perspective, focused on the memberships rather than on the cost function. Then the concept of graded possibility is introduced.
This is a partially possibilistic version of the fuzzy clustering model, as compared to Krishnapuram and Keller’s possibilistic clustering. We outline a basic graded possibilistic clustering algorithm and highlight the different properties attainable by means of experimental demonstrations.
This clustering model, which features as two special cases the standard Fuzzy c-Means and the Possibilistic Clustering algorithms, can be tuned to represent different data models, from partitional to multimodal and in-between. Moreover, the problem of outlier rejection can be tackled by a suitable tuning of the algorithm.


GENERALIZATION OF LINEAR FUZZY CLUSTERING

Linear fuzzy clustering is one of attractive extensions of FCM-type clustering method and partitions a data set into several linear clusters using linear varieties as the prototypes of clusters. Because the vectors spanning the prototypical linear varieties are the eigenvectors of fuzzy scatter matrices, the linear clustering algorithms are often identified with a simultaneous approach to fuzzy clustering and local principal component analysis (Local PCA).
In this tutorial, several approaches to the generalization of linear fuzzy clustering are shown. Considering the similarity with PCA, the objective function for linear fuzzy clustering is defined by using the lower rank approximation of data matrix and minimized with the optimization techniques used in PCA.
The modification enables to handle missing values or component-wise outliers that are difficult to deal with in the conventional algorithms. The above observation also implies a close relation between linear fuzzy clustering and Local PCA based on probabilistic mixture models.
We shall show a new paradigm of local PCA based on fuzzy modeling approaches.


A DIVISIVE CLUSTERING ALGORITHM BASED ON RANK

An alternative to clustering by partitioning the data space is clustering by a hierarchy of partitions, or Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering. This is the main tool used in some applications (for instance DNA microarray data analysis is routinely performed by this technique), since it produces trees, which are easy to analyze visually, but is not immune from problems.
Being an agglomerative method, one that considers just a pair of objects at each iteration, it is sensitive to small perturbations of data (which produce different hierarchical trees) and does not provide hints on the reasonable depth of the tree (under which further subdivisions are mainly due to noise).
We describe a different clustering technique, which is divisive and based on clustering the ranks of the distance matrix. This technique gets rid of the disadvantages above.


Vitas:
KATSUHIRO HONDA

Katsuhiro Honda is currently a Research Associate, Department of Industrial Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan.
He received the Bachelor of Engineering and the Master of Engineering in Industrial Engineering from Osaka Prefecture University, in 1997 and 1999, respectively.
His research interests include hybrid techniques of fuzzy clustering and multivariate analysis, data mining with fuzzy data analysis and neural networks.
He is the author or co-author of several scientific papers, published by journals and conference proceedings.
In 2002, he received the Best Paper Award from Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and systems discussing a thesis on the close relation between fuzzy clustering and probabilistic mixture models.

FRANCESCO MASULLI
Francesco Masulli is an Associate Professor of Computer Science with the University of Pisa (Italy). He received the Laurea degree in Physics from the University of Genova in 1976. After the military service, he was a researcher with the Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics (1978-1979), and with the Ansaldo Automazione Co. (1979-1983), and an Assistant Professor with the University of Genova (1983-2001). He was also in leave as a visiting scientist at the University of Nijmegen (Holland) in 1983, and at the International Computer Science Institute in Berkeley, California in 1991, 1993, and 1994.
He authored or co-authored more than 100 scientific papers on Machine Learning, Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems and Ensemble Methods and co-edited three books and two special issues of scientific journals on those subjects.
He serves as an Associate Editor the international journal "Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing". His previous duties include the chairing of the Conference of the International Graphomomics Society (IGS) in 1997, of the Symposium on Soft Computing (SOCO), in 1999, and the co-chairing of the 2002 Course of the International School on Neural Networks "E.R.Caianiello" on "Ensemble Methods in Learning Machines”, of the Workshop on Fuzzy Logic (WILF) in 1995, 1999, 2001, and 2003, and of a special session on Bioinformatics at IJCNN 2003. He had a tutorial on “Learning with multiple machines: ECOC models vs. Bayesian Framework” at IJCNN 2003.
He is member of the Italian Chapter of the IEEE-Neural Network Society, an affiliate member of the Berkeley Initiative on Soft Computing (BISC), and a Board Member of the Italian Neural Network Society (SIREN) and of the SIG Italy of the International Neural Network Society (INNS).


STEFANO ROVETTA

Stefano Rovetta is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy.
He has a Laurea degree and a PhD in Electronic Engineering (from the University of Genoa) and has worked for several years in the field of neural networks.
His recent research interests cover applications of clustering, neural networks, and other machine learning techniques to multimedia, biological, and medical problems.

(Back to top of FUZZ III)

"Fuzzy Sets for Words: Why Type-2 Fuzzy Sets Should be Used and How They Can be Used"
Jerry M. Mendel
University of Southern California
Integrated Media Systems Center
Electrical Engineering Department
Los Angeles, CA

Keywords:
Computing with words, type-2 fuzzy sets, interval type-2 fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic systems


Abstract
This tutorial begins with an explanation of the provocative statement that using type-1 fuzzy sets to model words is scientifically incorrect. It then proposes a modified fuzzy set for a word, one that immediately includes the intra- and inter-uncertainties that a person and a group of people have about a word. This modified fuzzy set is an interval type-2 fuzzy set. The rest of the tutorial then describes interval type-2 fuzzy sets and their use in rule-based type-2 fuzzy logic systems. It includes mathematical descriptions of and computations with type-2 fuzzy sets. Applications will be drawn from pattern classification, time-series forecasting, knowledge mining using IF-THEN surveys, and computing with words.

This tutorial will provide attendees with: (1) new tools that they can immediately use in a broad collection of applications—those that have uncertainties associated with them; (2) a good understanding of what “computing with words” is all about; and, (3) ideas for new research directions within the field of fuzzy sets and systems.


Vita: Jerry M. Mendel received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, Brooklyn, NY. Currently he is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Associate Director for Education, Outreach and Student Affairs of the Integrated Media Systems Center at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, where he has been since 1974. He has published over 440 technical papers and is author and/or editor of eight books, including Uncertain Rule-based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions (Prentice-Hall, 2001). His present research interests include: type-2 fuzzy logic systems and their applications to a wide range of problems, including target classification and computing with words, and spatio-temporal fusion of decisions. He is a Life Fellow of the IEEE and a Distinguished Member of the IEEE Control Systems Society. He was President of the IEEE Control Systems Society in 1986, and is presently Chairman of the Fuzzy Technical Committee and an elected member of the Administrative Committee of the IEEE Neural Networks Society. Among his awards are the 1983 Best Transactions Paper Award of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society, the 1992 Signal Processing Society Paper Award, the 2002 Transactions on Fuzzy Systems Outstanding Paper Award, a 1984 IEEE Centennial Medal, and an IEEE Third Millennium Medal. During his career he has taught more than 30 short courses.

(Back to top of FUZZ III)

 

This page (http://www.mindspring.com/~pci-inc/IJCNN04tutorials) was last modified on Jul. 1, 2004. Contact: m.padgett(at)ieee.org